Optical Powerhouse
Does anybody know which is more superior,
Carl Zeiss or Leica??
Carl Zeiss or Leica??
posted by Zidni at 7:11 PM
>> Friday, April 27, 2007
Search
About Me
- Name: Zidni
- Location: Bangi, Selangor, Malaysia
engineer, 3rd of 8, a blend of more colors than shown, enjoys technology, comedy, dwells on current events, worries intermittently, grows old quickly
Previous Posts
- Hang out
- Bruise? [edited]
- Supportive
- Quick Getaway
- Outstation Again...
- Avidus Visitus
- Great Man
- Hectic Hectare
- Kelana Jaya Ceremony
- F1.. set.. go..
System
-
- PowerBook G4 1GHz
- 1024MB SDRAM
- 120GB HDD
Countdown
Blog stats
hits.
- since June 2002.
7 Comments:
I go for Leica, the camera body seem anachronistically aesthetic (even the new digital SLR).
Carl Zeiss seems to be all the rage for camera phone, even Sony Alpha α100 Digital SLR comes with one.
Optically, I don't have a say on this.
In marketing, Carl Zeiss manages to penetrate the "plebeian" camera aficionados (with entry level SLR lenses) while Leica still rank highly in "bourgeoisie" deep-pocket.
optically.. i'm shortsighted. lol..
thanks for the input, man. Leica is wide-angled. Carl Zeiss is geared more on video-lens.. right? I don't know. I'm actually looking for a good digital camera. budget around rm1.5k. suggestions, anyone...
tanya farah y la.
Definitely Leica man.. but the Red Dot will cost you a lot. Except maybe if you go for Panasonic which is using Leica's lens without the Red Dot.
intan: yeah.. ok. i'll ask her. thanks.
taufiq: did u mean the red-eye effect? is red dot a feature of the lens? panasonic does adopt leica lens whereas sony puts carl zeiss' in just about any imaging devices they got.
Red Dot = Leica brand's logo.
really? ahaha.. silly me.
Post a Comment
<< Home